Lamar Jackson

Lamar Jackson Stats: Ravens Blank Bengals 24-0 in a Week 15 Shutout

Most box scores bury how Lamar Jackson really impacts a game, so casual fans assume low volume means a quiet afternoon. That assumption misses the point entirely when a quarterback holds the ball for barely 20 minutes and still wins by 24. The fix is a deeper look at the numbers. This Lamar Jackson stats breakdown of the Ravens’ 24-0 Week 15 shutout of the Bengals shows exactly how Baltimore won.

Lamar Jackson: Career at a Glance

AttributeDetails
Full NameLamar Demeatrice Jackson Jr.
TeamBaltimore Ravens (NFL)
PositionQuarterback
Jersey Number8
BornJanuary 7, 1997 (age 29)
BirthplacePompano Beach, Florida
Height / Weight6’2″ / 205 lbs
CollegeLouisville
NFL Draft2018, Round 1, Pick 32 (Baltimore Ravens)
Career Honors2x NFL MVP (2019, 2023), 3x First-Team All-Pro, 4x Pro Bowl
2025 Season13 games: 2,549 passing yards, 21 TD, 7 INT, 349 rushing yards, 2 rush TD
Career Totals22,608 passing yards, 187 TD, 56 INT; 6,522 rushing yards, 35 rush TD

On Sunday, December 14, 2025, Lamar Jackson threw two first-half touchdown passes and the Ravens’ defense delivered its first shutout since 2018, blanking the Cincinnati Bengals 24-0 at Paycor Stadium. A bundled-up crowd of 64,907 watched in 10-degree weather, the coldest game in Ravens franchise history, as Baltimore snapped a two-game losing streak and climbed back to .500 at 7-7. The result officially ended Cincinnati’s playoff hopes, dropping the Bengals to 4-10.

Baltimore won this Ravens vs Bengals matchup without the ball. The offense held possession for just 20:41, the lowest time of possession in a victory the team posted all season, yet scored on three straight drives spanning the second and third quarters. Jackson completed 8 of 12 passes for 150 yards and two touchdowns, Derrick Henry ground out 100 yards on 11 carries, and the defense intercepted Joe Burrow twice, returning the second pick 84 yards for a touchdown to seal the shutout.

Match Overview

InformationMatch Details
EventNFL Regular Season, Week 15 (AFC North)
GameBaltimore Ravens vs Cincinnati Bengals
DateSunday, December 14, 2025
VenuePaycor Stadium, Cincinnati, Ohio
Attendance64,907
WinnerBaltimore Ravens
Final ScoreRavens 24, Bengals 0
BroadcastCBS (regional), streaming on Paramount+ and NFL+

Core Match Statistics Overview

Team MetricBaltimore RavensCincinnati Bengals
Total Yards317298
First Downs1518
Passing (Cmp-Att-Yds-TD-INT)8-12-150-2-125-39-225-0-2
Rushing (Att-Yds-TD)24-189-029-100-0
Sacks Allowed (Yards Lost)4 (22)3 (27)
Turnovers12
Third-Down Conversions2-7 (28.6%)3-15 (20.0%)
Fourth-Down Conversions0-03-5 (60.0%)
Red-Zone Trips (TDs)1 (0)1 (0)
Penalties (Yards)2 (10)4 (30)
Time of Possession20:4139:19

The raw totals look close, but they hide a lopsided efficiency gap. Cincinnati out-gained Baltimore in first downs and time of possession and still lost by 24 points, which tells you the real story lives in yards per play, turnover timing, and red-zone failure.

Lamar Jackson Passing Yards: Efficiency Over Volume

Jackson finished with only 150 passing yards, a total that undersells how sharp he was.

  • His 12.5 yards per attempt dwarfed Burrow’s 5.8, meaning every throw moved the Ravens downfield almost twice as far.
  • A 114.6 passer rating and 16.7% touchdown rate turned 12 attempts into two scores, the definition of low-volume, high-leverage quarterbacking.

Derrick Henry Rushing Yards and the Ground Game

Baltimore ran for 189 yards at 7.9 yards per carry while holding Cincinnati to 100 yards at 3.4 per attempt.

  • Derrick Henry’s 100 yards on 11 carries (9.1 per rush) marked his sixth 100-yard game of the season and kept drives on schedule.
  • Keaton Mitchell chipped in 66 yards on 8 carries, so the Ravens never needed Jackson’s legs to sustain the offense.

Ravens Defense Shutout: Third Down and Takeaways

The Ravens defense turned the game on money downs and took the ball away at the right moments.

  • Cincinnati converted just 3 of 15 third downs (20%), and its 3-for-5 fourth-down rate reflected desperation, not success.
  • Two interceptions, three sacks, ten quarterback hits, and a forced fumble produced Baltimore’s first shutout since blanking Tennessee 21-0 on October 14, 2018.

The Time-of-Possession Paradox

Holding the ball for 39:19 usually wins games; here it lost one by 24 points.

  • Cincinnati’s slow, chain-moving drives generated 18 first downs but zero points, proving possession without explosion is empty.
  • Baltimore’s 20:41 with the ball translated to 24 points because nearly every scoring drive came in explosive chunks.

Period-by-Period Analysis

First Quarter: A Scoreless Chess Match

PeriodRavensBengals
1st Quarter00
  • Both offenses traded punts in the freezing conditions, and neither quarterback found rhythm early.
  • Baltimore’s defense set an immediate tone, forcing a three-and-out on the Bengals’ opening possession.
  • The quarter ended 0-0, but the Bengals were already losing the field-position battle.

Second Quarter: Lamar Jackson Touchdown Passes Break It Open

PeriodRavensBengals
2nd Quarter140
  • A five-play, 79-yard drive ended when Jackson hit Rasheen Ali for a 30-yard touchdown at the 4:35 mark.
  • With 23 seconds left, Jackson dropped a 28-yard strike to Zay Flowers in stride to cap an 80-yard sprint for a 14-0 halftime lead.
  • Two scoring drives in a hurry flipped a scoreless game into a two-possession cushion built on Jackson’s downfield accuracy.

Third Quarter: A Field Goal Widens the Margin

PeriodRavensBengals
3rd Quarter30
  • Cincinnati’s most promising march died on a fourth-down stop, handing the Ravens a short field.
  • Tyler Loop converted a 27-yard field goal at the 9:05 mark to push the lead to 17-0.
  • The Bengals kept moving the ball between the 20s but stalled again, and the shutout began to feel inevitable.

Fourth Quarter: The Pick-Six Seals the Shutout

PeriodRavensBengals
4th Quarter70
  • Kyle Van Noy intercepted Burrow and flipped the ball to Alohi Gilman, who raced 84 yards for a touchdown at the 7:38 mark.
  • The defensive score made it 24-0 and drained any remaining fight from the Bengals’ sideline.
  • Baltimore’s reserves closed out the final minutes to preserve the franchise’s first road shutout in seven seasons.

Baltimore Ravens Player Statistics

Lamar Jackson (QB)

StatValue
Passing8/12, 150 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT
Rushing2 carries, 26 yards
Sacks Taken4
Passer Rating114.6

Jackson did not need volume to control the game. He averaged 12.5 yards per attempt and delivered two perfectly placed touchdowns in the final five minutes of the first half, turning a tight game into a comfortable lead before the break. His lone interception bounced off a receiver’s hands, which kept his actual decision-making clean all afternoon.

Derrick Henry (RB)

StatValue
Carries11
Rushing Yards100
Yards per Carry9.1
Longest Run29

Henry hammered the Bengals’ front for 100 yards on only 11 carries, keeping Baltimore ahead of the chains without piling up wear. His patient, downhill style gave the Ravens a clock-chewing counterpunch to Jackson’s vertical strikes.

Zay Flowers (WR)

StatValue
Targets5
Receptions3
Receiving Yards68
Touchdowns1

Flowers beat tight coverage for a 28-yard touchdown just before halftime and finished as Baltimore’s leading receiver. His sideline work on the final scoring drive showed why he remains Jackson’s most trusted target in critical spots.

Roquan Smith (LB)

StatValue
Total Tackles14
Solo Tackles8
Assisted Tackles6

Smith was the engine of the shutout, piling up a game-high 14 tackles and erasing Cincinnati’s underneath passing game. With Smith cleaning up between the tackles, the Bengals never found an easy completion in the middle of the field. Alohi Gilman added five tackles and the 84-yard pick-six return that sealed the result.

Cincinnati Bengals Player Statistics

Joe Burrow (QB)

StatValue
Passing25/39, 225 yards, 0 TD, 2 INT
Rushing2 carries, 5 yards
Sacks Taken3
Passer Rating58.2

Burrow moved the ball between the 20s but never reached the end zone, finishing with a 58.2 passer rating in the first shutout of his NFL career. Both of his interceptions came at damaging moments, the second returned 84 yards the other way to end any comeback hope.

Ja’Marr Chase (WR)

StatValue
Targets16
Receptions10
Receiving Yards132
Longest Catch34

Chase was the only Cincinnati weapon who consistently won his matchup, catching 10 balls for 132 yards on a heavy 16-target workload. His production padded the stat sheet but produced no points, a microcosm of the Bengals’ entire afternoon.

Chase Brown (RB)

StatValue
Carries13
Rushing Yards53
Receptions7 for 37 yards
Scrimmage Yards90

Brown grinded out 90 scrimmage yards but averaged just 4.1 per carry against a Ravens front that swarmed to the ball. His inability to create chunk runs left the Bengals facing long down-and-distance all day.

Demetrius Knight Jr. (LB)

StatValue
Sacks2
Total Tackles6
Tackles for Loss2
Forced Fumbles1

Knight was Cincinnati’s lone bright spot on defense, sacking Jackson twice and forcing a fumble that the quarterback recovered himself. His pressure disrupted several drives, but the offense behind him never cashed in the field position those stops created.

Statistical Leaders Summary

CategoryBaltimore RavensCincinnati Bengals
Leading PasserLamar Jackson (150 yds, 2 TD)Joe Burrow (225 yds, 0 TD, 2 INT)
Leading RusherDerrick Henry (100 yds, 9.1 YPC)Chase Brown (53 yds, 4.1 YPC)
Leading ReceiverZay Flowers (68 yds, 1 TD)Ja’Marr Chase (132 yds, 0 TD)
Defensive AnchorRoquan Smith (14 tackles)Jordan Battle (8 tackles, 1 INT)

Why the Ravens Won

Explosive, Efficient Passing

Passing MetricLamar JacksonJoe Burrow
Yards per Attempt12.55.8
Completion %66.7%64.1%
Touchdowns20
Interceptions12
Sacks Taken43
Passer Rating114.658.2
Adjusted Net Yards/Attempt7.72.6

Jackson posted 7.7 adjusted net yards per attempt to Burrow’s 2.6, a chasm that decided the game.

  • Every Jackson dropback was worth more than double Burrow’s in expected value, even with four sacks mixed in.
  • The two quarterbacks threw the same number of interceptions per attempt, but Jackson paired his mistake with two scores while Burrow paired his with none.

Derrick Henry Rushing Yards Set the Tone

Rushing MetricRavensBengals
Attempts2429
Yards189100
Yards per Carry7.93.4
Longest Run2910

Baltimore’s 189-yard ground day doubled Cincinnati’s output on five fewer carries.

  • Henry and Mitchell combined for 166 yards and never let the Bengals’ pass rush pin its ears back on second down.
  • Cincinnati’s longest run went for 10 yards, meaning the Bengals needed eight or nine plays every time they touched the ball, a formula the Ravens’ defense happily accepted.

A Takeaway Machine on Defense

Defensive MetricRavensBengals
Sacks34
Quarterback Hits105
Interceptions21
Forced Fumbles11
Takeaways21
Points Allowed024

The Ravens defense generated ten quarterback hits and two interceptions, one of which went for a touchdown.

  • Constant pressure sped up Burrow’s clock and turned the Bengals’ possession advantage into a meaningless statistic.
  • The pick-six, plus the earlier fourth-down stop, meant Cincinnati’s best two scoring chances both ended in Baltimore points or a momentum swing.

Discipline and Situational Defense

Situational MetricRavensBengals
Penalties (Yards)2 (10)4 (30)
Third-Down % Allowed20.0%28.6%
Red-Zone TDs Allowed00
Turnover Margin+1-1

Baltimore committed two penalties for ten yards all game and won the turnover margin.

  • The Ravens surrendered no red-zone touchdowns and held firm on the two fourth downs that mattered most.
  • Cincinnati gave away 30 penalty yards and a turnover margin, small leaks that became fatal in a shutout.

Why the Bengals Lost

Yards Without Points: The Efficiency Collapse

Offensive MetricBengalsRavens
Total Yards298317
First Downs1815
Third-Down Conversions3-152-7
Red-Zone TDs00
Points Scored024

Cincinnati moved the ball 298 yards, earned 18 first downs, and scored zero points.

  • The Bengals’ third-down rate fell to 20%, and their red-zone trip ended without a touchdown, the two spots where games are actually won.
  • Chasing the scoreboard, they went for it on fourth down five times, converting three but never turning any of it into points.

Joe Burrow Interceptions and Constant Pressure

Pressure MetricBurrow (CIN)Jackson (BAL)
Sacks Taken34
Quarterback Hits Absorbed105
Interceptions21
Yards per Attempt5.812.5
Passer Rating58.2114.6

Burrow absorbed ten hits and never escaped the Ravens’ rush, and it showed in his 58.2 rating.

  • Two interceptions at decisive moments turned promising possessions into empty ones, including the fourth-quarter pick-six.
  • With a 34-yard long completion as his ceiling, Burrow’s offense became a series of short completions that died near midfield.

A Wasted Time-of-Possession Edge

  • Cincinnati controlled the ball for 39:19, nearly double Baltimore’s 20:41, and turned it into nothing.
  • The Bengals’ methodical drives exhausted their own receivers on short routes while Baltimore’s explosive strikes scored in a fraction of the time.
  • Possession without explosive plays is just yardage, and Cincinnati proved the point all afternoon.

Historical Context & Advanced Insights

Season Series Breakdown

DateMatchupResultVenue
Nov 27, 2025Bengals at RavensBengals 32, Ravens 14M&T Bank Stadium
Dec 14, 2025Ravens at BengalsRavens 24, Bengals 0Paycor Stadium
Nov 7, 2024Bengals at RavensRavens 35, Bengals 34M&T Bank Stadium
Oct 6, 2024Ravens at BengalsRavens 41, Bengals 38 (OT)Paycor Stadium

The December shutout split the 2025 season series at one game apiece, erasing the memory of Cincinnati’s 32-14 Thanksgiving-week win in Baltimore. Across the four most recent meetings, the two rivals had combined for 88, 69, and 79 points before this 24-point defensive masterpiece, which made the zero on Cincinnati’s side of the board feel almost historic. It marked the Bengals’ first shutout loss since the 2017 season opener, also against Baltimore, and the first time Joe Burrow had ever been blanked as a starter.

Advanced Statistical Insights

The gap in yards per play tells the real story. Baltimore gained 317 yards on 40 offensive plays, good for 7.9 yards per snap, while Cincinnati needed 71 plays to gain 298 yards, a 4.2-yard average. On a per-play basis, the Ravens were nearly twice as efficient, which is why a 19-minute possession deficit never mattered.

Adjusted net yards per attempt, the passing metric that weighs touchdowns, interceptions, and sacks together, painted an even starker picture: Jackson finished at 7.7 ANY/A against Burrow’s 2.6. That single number collapses Jackson’s efficiency, Burrow’s two picks, and both quarterbacks’ sack totals into one clean comparison, and it says the Ravens won the most important position on the field by a wide margin.

Points per possession sealed the deal. Baltimore squeezed 17 offensive points out of roughly 40 plays, about 0.43 points per snap, while Cincinnati’s 71 plays produced exactly zero. When one team scores on three straight drives and the other cannot score on 71 snaps, the deeper numbers confirm what the scoreboard already shouted: explosive efficiency, not raw volume, decided this game.

Game Implications & Key Lessons

What This Means for the Ravens

  • The win lifted Baltimore to 7-7 and kept its AFC North chase alive with three weeks to play, turning the pressure back onto Pittsburgh.
  • The defense’s shutdown performance revealed a championship floor: a unit that could win games even when the offense held the ball for barely 20 minutes.
  • The efficiency of the passing game, even in low volume, reestablished Jackson’s MVP-level floor after two straight losses.

What This Means for the Bengals

  • Falling to 4-10 officially eliminated Cincinnati from postseason contention for the third straight season, wasting another prime year of Burrow’s career.
  • The offense’s inability to convert 18 first downs and 298 yards into a single point exposed a red-zone and third-down crisis that no amount of Chase targets could fix.
  • A defense that sacked Jackson four times and forced a fumble still lost by 24, proof that isolated stops mean nothing without complementary scoring.

Key Lessons

  • Yards per attempt, not total yards, decided the game: 12.5 to 5.8 in Jackson’s favor.
  • Derrick Henry’s 100-yard day kept the Ravens ahead of the sticks and neutralized the Bengals’ pass rush.
  • Turnovers at the wrong moment, especially the 84-yard pick-six, flipped a competitive game into a blowout.
  • Third-down defense was the quiet killer; Cincinnati converted just 3 of 15.
  • Time of possession is worthless without points; 39:19 with the ball produced a goose egg.
  • A two-touchdown flurry before halftime can break a road game open faster than a full half of grinding drives.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Ravens vs Bengals game on December 14, 2025?

The Baltimore Ravens beat the Cincinnati Bengals 24-0 at Paycor Stadium, posting their first shutout since 2018 and eliminating the Bengals from playoff contention.

What were Lamar Jackson’s stats in the shutout?

Lamar Jackson completed 8 of 12 passes for 150 yards and two touchdowns with one interception, plus two carries for 26 yards, finishing with a 114.6 passer rating.

How many passing yards did Lamar Jackson have?

Lamar Jackson threw for 150 passing yards against Cincinnati, averaging 12.5 yards per attempt on just 12 throws.

How many touchdown passes did Lamar Jackson throw?

He threw two touchdown passes, a 30-yard strike to Rasheen Ali and a 28-yard strike to Zay Flowers, both in the second quarter.

Did Derrick Henry rush for 100 yards?

Yes, Derrick Henry rushed for exactly 100 yards on 11 carries, averaging 9.1 yards per attempt, for his sixth 100-yard game of the 2025 season.

How many interceptions did Joe Burrow throw?

Joe Burrow threw two interceptions, including a fourth-quarter pick that Kyle Van Noy intercepted and lateraled to Alohi Gilman for an 84-yard touchdown.

Conclusion

The Ravens’ 24-0 win over the Bengals was a clinic in doing more with less. Baltimore turned 40 plays into 24 points while Cincinnati turned 71 plays into nothing, a reversal of everything raw volume suggests. Lamar Jackson’s two-touchdown, 12.5-yards-per-attempt afternoon paired with Derrick Henry’s grinding 100-yard day and a defense that produced two interceptions and ten quarterback hits showed why balanced, explosive football beats individual production every time. Efficiency beat effort, teamwork beat talent, and the scoreboard left no doubt about which mattered more.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *