Lamar Jackson Stats: Ravens Blank Bengals 24-0 in a Week 15 Shutout
Most box scores bury how Lamar Jackson really impacts a game, so casual fans assume low volume means a quiet afternoon. That assumption misses the point entirely when a quarterback holds the ball for barely 20 minutes and still wins by 24. The fix is a deeper look at the numbers. This Lamar Jackson stats breakdown of the Ravens’ 24-0 Week 15 shutout of the Bengals shows exactly how Baltimore won.
Lamar Jackson: Career at a Glance
| Attribute | Details |
|---|---|
| Full Name | Lamar Demeatrice Jackson Jr. |
| Team | Baltimore Ravens (NFL) |
| Position | Quarterback |
| Jersey Number | 8 |
| Born | January 7, 1997 (age 29) |
| Birthplace | Pompano Beach, Florida |
| Height / Weight | 6’2″ / 205 lbs |
| College | Louisville |
| NFL Draft | 2018, Round 1, Pick 32 (Baltimore Ravens) |
| Career Honors | 2x NFL MVP (2019, 2023), 3x First-Team All-Pro, 4x Pro Bowl |
| 2025 Season | 13 games: 2,549 passing yards, 21 TD, 7 INT, 349 rushing yards, 2 rush TD |
| Career Totals | 22,608 passing yards, 187 TD, 56 INT; 6,522 rushing yards, 35 rush TD |
On Sunday, December 14, 2025, Lamar Jackson threw two first-half touchdown passes and the Ravens’ defense delivered its first shutout since 2018, blanking the Cincinnati Bengals 24-0 at Paycor Stadium. A bundled-up crowd of 64,907 watched in 10-degree weather, the coldest game in Ravens franchise history, as Baltimore snapped a two-game losing streak and climbed back to .500 at 7-7. The result officially ended Cincinnati’s playoff hopes, dropping the Bengals to 4-10.
Baltimore won this Ravens vs Bengals matchup without the ball. The offense held possession for just 20:41, the lowest time of possession in a victory the team posted all season, yet scored on three straight drives spanning the second and third quarters. Jackson completed 8 of 12 passes for 150 yards and two touchdowns, Derrick Henry ground out 100 yards on 11 carries, and the defense intercepted Joe Burrow twice, returning the second pick 84 yards for a touchdown to seal the shutout.
Match Overview
| Information | Match Details |
|---|---|
| Event | NFL Regular Season, Week 15 (AFC North) |
| Game | Baltimore Ravens vs Cincinnati Bengals |
| Date | Sunday, December 14, 2025 |
| Venue | Paycor Stadium, Cincinnati, Ohio |
| Attendance | 64,907 |
| Winner | Baltimore Ravens |
| Final Score | Ravens 24, Bengals 0 |
| Broadcast | CBS (regional), streaming on Paramount+ and NFL+ |
Core Match Statistics Overview
| Team Metric | Baltimore Ravens | Cincinnati Bengals |
|---|---|---|
| Total Yards | 317 | 298 |
| First Downs | 15 | 18 |
| Passing (Cmp-Att-Yds-TD-INT) | 8-12-150-2-1 | 25-39-225-0-2 |
| Rushing (Att-Yds-TD) | 24-189-0 | 29-100-0 |
| Sacks Allowed (Yards Lost) | 4 (22) | 3 (27) |
| Turnovers | 1 | 2 |
| Third-Down Conversions | 2-7 (28.6%) | 3-15 (20.0%) |
| Fourth-Down Conversions | 0-0 | 3-5 (60.0%) |
| Red-Zone Trips (TDs) | 1 (0) | 1 (0) |
| Penalties (Yards) | 2 (10) | 4 (30) |
| Time of Possession | 20:41 | 39:19 |
The raw totals look close, but they hide a lopsided efficiency gap. Cincinnati out-gained Baltimore in first downs and time of possession and still lost by 24 points, which tells you the real story lives in yards per play, turnover timing, and red-zone failure.
Lamar Jackson Passing Yards: Efficiency Over Volume
Jackson finished with only 150 passing yards, a total that undersells how sharp he was.
- His 12.5 yards per attempt dwarfed Burrow’s 5.8, meaning every throw moved the Ravens downfield almost twice as far.
- A 114.6 passer rating and 16.7% touchdown rate turned 12 attempts into two scores, the definition of low-volume, high-leverage quarterbacking.
Derrick Henry Rushing Yards and the Ground Game
Baltimore ran for 189 yards at 7.9 yards per carry while holding Cincinnati to 100 yards at 3.4 per attempt.
- Derrick Henry’s 100 yards on 11 carries (9.1 per rush) marked his sixth 100-yard game of the season and kept drives on schedule.
- Keaton Mitchell chipped in 66 yards on 8 carries, so the Ravens never needed Jackson’s legs to sustain the offense.
Ravens Defense Shutout: Third Down and Takeaways
The Ravens defense turned the game on money downs and took the ball away at the right moments.
- Cincinnati converted just 3 of 15 third downs (20%), and its 3-for-5 fourth-down rate reflected desperation, not success.
- Two interceptions, three sacks, ten quarterback hits, and a forced fumble produced Baltimore’s first shutout since blanking Tennessee 21-0 on October 14, 2018.
The Time-of-Possession Paradox
Holding the ball for 39:19 usually wins games; here it lost one by 24 points.
- Cincinnati’s slow, chain-moving drives generated 18 first downs but zero points, proving possession without explosion is empty.
- Baltimore’s 20:41 with the ball translated to 24 points because nearly every scoring drive came in explosive chunks.
Period-by-Period Analysis
First Quarter: A Scoreless Chess Match
| Period | Ravens | Bengals |
|---|---|---|
| 1st Quarter | 0 | 0 |
- Both offenses traded punts in the freezing conditions, and neither quarterback found rhythm early.
- Baltimore’s defense set an immediate tone, forcing a three-and-out on the Bengals’ opening possession.
- The quarter ended 0-0, but the Bengals were already losing the field-position battle.
Second Quarter: Lamar Jackson Touchdown Passes Break It Open
| Period | Ravens | Bengals |
|---|---|---|
| 2nd Quarter | 14 | 0 |
- A five-play, 79-yard drive ended when Jackson hit Rasheen Ali for a 30-yard touchdown at the 4:35 mark.
- With 23 seconds left, Jackson dropped a 28-yard strike to Zay Flowers in stride to cap an 80-yard sprint for a 14-0 halftime lead.
- Two scoring drives in a hurry flipped a scoreless game into a two-possession cushion built on Jackson’s downfield accuracy.
Third Quarter: A Field Goal Widens the Margin
| Period | Ravens | Bengals |
|---|---|---|
| 3rd Quarter | 3 | 0 |
- Cincinnati’s most promising march died on a fourth-down stop, handing the Ravens a short field.
- Tyler Loop converted a 27-yard field goal at the 9:05 mark to push the lead to 17-0.
- The Bengals kept moving the ball between the 20s but stalled again, and the shutout began to feel inevitable.
Fourth Quarter: The Pick-Six Seals the Shutout
| Period | Ravens | Bengals |
|---|---|---|
| 4th Quarter | 7 | 0 |
- Kyle Van Noy intercepted Burrow and flipped the ball to Alohi Gilman, who raced 84 yards for a touchdown at the 7:38 mark.
- The defensive score made it 24-0 and drained any remaining fight from the Bengals’ sideline.
- Baltimore’s reserves closed out the final minutes to preserve the franchise’s first road shutout in seven seasons.
Baltimore Ravens Player Statistics
Lamar Jackson (QB)
| Stat | Value |
|---|---|
| Passing | 8/12, 150 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT |
| Rushing | 2 carries, 26 yards |
| Sacks Taken | 4 |
| Passer Rating | 114.6 |
Jackson did not need volume to control the game. He averaged 12.5 yards per attempt and delivered two perfectly placed touchdowns in the final five minutes of the first half, turning a tight game into a comfortable lead before the break. His lone interception bounced off a receiver’s hands, which kept his actual decision-making clean all afternoon.
Derrick Henry (RB)
| Stat | Value |
|---|---|
| Carries | 11 |
| Rushing Yards | 100 |
| Yards per Carry | 9.1 |
| Longest Run | 29 |
Henry hammered the Bengals’ front for 100 yards on only 11 carries, keeping Baltimore ahead of the chains without piling up wear. His patient, downhill style gave the Ravens a clock-chewing counterpunch to Jackson’s vertical strikes.
Zay Flowers (WR)
| Stat | Value |
|---|---|
| Targets | 5 |
| Receptions | 3 |
| Receiving Yards | 68 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
Flowers beat tight coverage for a 28-yard touchdown just before halftime and finished as Baltimore’s leading receiver. His sideline work on the final scoring drive showed why he remains Jackson’s most trusted target in critical spots.
Roquan Smith (LB)
| Stat | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Tackles | 14 |
| Solo Tackles | 8 |
| Assisted Tackles | 6 |
Smith was the engine of the shutout, piling up a game-high 14 tackles and erasing Cincinnati’s underneath passing game. With Smith cleaning up between the tackles, the Bengals never found an easy completion in the middle of the field. Alohi Gilman added five tackles and the 84-yard pick-six return that sealed the result.
Cincinnati Bengals Player Statistics
Joe Burrow (QB)
| Stat | Value |
|---|---|
| Passing | 25/39, 225 yards, 0 TD, 2 INT |
| Rushing | 2 carries, 5 yards |
| Sacks Taken | 3 |
| Passer Rating | 58.2 |
Burrow moved the ball between the 20s but never reached the end zone, finishing with a 58.2 passer rating in the first shutout of his NFL career. Both of his interceptions came at damaging moments, the second returned 84 yards the other way to end any comeback hope.
Ja’Marr Chase (WR)
| Stat | Value |
|---|---|
| Targets | 16 |
| Receptions | 10 |
| Receiving Yards | 132 |
| Longest Catch | 34 |
Chase was the only Cincinnati weapon who consistently won his matchup, catching 10 balls for 132 yards on a heavy 16-target workload. His production padded the stat sheet but produced no points, a microcosm of the Bengals’ entire afternoon.
Chase Brown (RB)
| Stat | Value |
|---|---|
| Carries | 13 |
| Rushing Yards | 53 |
| Receptions | 7 for 37 yards |
| Scrimmage Yards | 90 |
Brown grinded out 90 scrimmage yards but averaged just 4.1 per carry against a Ravens front that swarmed to the ball. His inability to create chunk runs left the Bengals facing long down-and-distance all day.
Demetrius Knight Jr. (LB)
| Stat | Value |
|---|---|
| Sacks | 2 |
| Total Tackles | 6 |
| Tackles for Loss | 2 |
| Forced Fumbles | 1 |
Knight was Cincinnati’s lone bright spot on defense, sacking Jackson twice and forcing a fumble that the quarterback recovered himself. His pressure disrupted several drives, but the offense behind him never cashed in the field position those stops created.
Statistical Leaders Summary
| Category | Baltimore Ravens | Cincinnati Bengals |
|---|---|---|
| Leading Passer | Lamar Jackson (150 yds, 2 TD) | Joe Burrow (225 yds, 0 TD, 2 INT) |
| Leading Rusher | Derrick Henry (100 yds, 9.1 YPC) | Chase Brown (53 yds, 4.1 YPC) |
| Leading Receiver | Zay Flowers (68 yds, 1 TD) | Ja’Marr Chase (132 yds, 0 TD) |
| Defensive Anchor | Roquan Smith (14 tackles) | Jordan Battle (8 tackles, 1 INT) |
Why the Ravens Won
Explosive, Efficient Passing
| Passing Metric | Lamar Jackson | Joe Burrow |
|---|---|---|
| Yards per Attempt | 12.5 | 5.8 |
| Completion % | 66.7% | 64.1% |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 2 |
| Sacks Taken | 4 | 3 |
| Passer Rating | 114.6 | 58.2 |
| Adjusted Net Yards/Attempt | 7.7 | 2.6 |
Jackson posted 7.7 adjusted net yards per attempt to Burrow’s 2.6, a chasm that decided the game.
- Every Jackson dropback was worth more than double Burrow’s in expected value, even with four sacks mixed in.
- The two quarterbacks threw the same number of interceptions per attempt, but Jackson paired his mistake with two scores while Burrow paired his with none.
Derrick Henry Rushing Yards Set the Tone
| Rushing Metric | Ravens | Bengals |
|---|---|---|
| Attempts | 24 | 29 |
| Yards | 189 | 100 |
| Yards per Carry | 7.9 | 3.4 |
| Longest Run | 29 | 10 |
Baltimore’s 189-yard ground day doubled Cincinnati’s output on five fewer carries.
- Henry and Mitchell combined for 166 yards and never let the Bengals’ pass rush pin its ears back on second down.
- Cincinnati’s longest run went for 10 yards, meaning the Bengals needed eight or nine plays every time they touched the ball, a formula the Ravens’ defense happily accepted.
A Takeaway Machine on Defense
| Defensive Metric | Ravens | Bengals |
|---|---|---|
| Sacks | 3 | 4 |
| Quarterback Hits | 10 | 5 |
| Interceptions | 2 | 1 |
| Forced Fumbles | 1 | 1 |
| Takeaways | 2 | 1 |
| Points Allowed | 0 | 24 |
The Ravens defense generated ten quarterback hits and two interceptions, one of which went for a touchdown.
- Constant pressure sped up Burrow’s clock and turned the Bengals’ possession advantage into a meaningless statistic.
- The pick-six, plus the earlier fourth-down stop, meant Cincinnati’s best two scoring chances both ended in Baltimore points or a momentum swing.
Discipline and Situational Defense
| Situational Metric | Ravens | Bengals |
|---|---|---|
| Penalties (Yards) | 2 (10) | 4 (30) |
| Third-Down % Allowed | 20.0% | 28.6% |
| Red-Zone TDs Allowed | 0 | 0 |
| Turnover Margin | +1 | -1 |
Baltimore committed two penalties for ten yards all game and won the turnover margin.
- The Ravens surrendered no red-zone touchdowns and held firm on the two fourth downs that mattered most.
- Cincinnati gave away 30 penalty yards and a turnover margin, small leaks that became fatal in a shutout.
Why the Bengals Lost
Yards Without Points: The Efficiency Collapse
| Offensive Metric | Bengals | Ravens |
|---|---|---|
| Total Yards | 298 | 317 |
| First Downs | 18 | 15 |
| Third-Down Conversions | 3-15 | 2-7 |
| Red-Zone TDs | 0 | 0 |
| Points Scored | 0 | 24 |
Cincinnati moved the ball 298 yards, earned 18 first downs, and scored zero points.
- The Bengals’ third-down rate fell to 20%, and their red-zone trip ended without a touchdown, the two spots where games are actually won.
- Chasing the scoreboard, they went for it on fourth down five times, converting three but never turning any of it into points.
Joe Burrow Interceptions and Constant Pressure
| Pressure Metric | Burrow (CIN) | Jackson (BAL) |
|---|---|---|
| Sacks Taken | 3 | 4 |
| Quarterback Hits Absorbed | 10 | 5 |
| Interceptions | 2 | 1 |
| Yards per Attempt | 5.8 | 12.5 |
| Passer Rating | 58.2 | 114.6 |
Burrow absorbed ten hits and never escaped the Ravens’ rush, and it showed in his 58.2 rating.
- Two interceptions at decisive moments turned promising possessions into empty ones, including the fourth-quarter pick-six.
- With a 34-yard long completion as his ceiling, Burrow’s offense became a series of short completions that died near midfield.
A Wasted Time-of-Possession Edge
- Cincinnati controlled the ball for 39:19, nearly double Baltimore’s 20:41, and turned it into nothing.
- The Bengals’ methodical drives exhausted their own receivers on short routes while Baltimore’s explosive strikes scored in a fraction of the time.
- Possession without explosive plays is just yardage, and Cincinnati proved the point all afternoon.
Historical Context & Advanced Insights
Season Series Breakdown
| Date | Matchup | Result | Venue |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2025 | Bengals at Ravens | Bengals 32, Ravens 14 | M&T Bank Stadium |
| Dec 14, 2025 | Ravens at Bengals | Ravens 24, Bengals 0 | Paycor Stadium |
| Nov 7, 2024 | Bengals at Ravens | Ravens 35, Bengals 34 | M&T Bank Stadium |
| Oct 6, 2024 | Ravens at Bengals | Ravens 41, Bengals 38 (OT) | Paycor Stadium |
The December shutout split the 2025 season series at one game apiece, erasing the memory of Cincinnati’s 32-14 Thanksgiving-week win in Baltimore. Across the four most recent meetings, the two rivals had combined for 88, 69, and 79 points before this 24-point defensive masterpiece, which made the zero on Cincinnati’s side of the board feel almost historic. It marked the Bengals’ first shutout loss since the 2017 season opener, also against Baltimore, and the first time Joe Burrow had ever been blanked as a starter.
Advanced Statistical Insights
The gap in yards per play tells the real story. Baltimore gained 317 yards on 40 offensive plays, good for 7.9 yards per snap, while Cincinnati needed 71 plays to gain 298 yards, a 4.2-yard average. On a per-play basis, the Ravens were nearly twice as efficient, which is why a 19-minute possession deficit never mattered.
Adjusted net yards per attempt, the passing metric that weighs touchdowns, interceptions, and sacks together, painted an even starker picture: Jackson finished at 7.7 ANY/A against Burrow’s 2.6. That single number collapses Jackson’s efficiency, Burrow’s two picks, and both quarterbacks’ sack totals into one clean comparison, and it says the Ravens won the most important position on the field by a wide margin.
Points per possession sealed the deal. Baltimore squeezed 17 offensive points out of roughly 40 plays, about 0.43 points per snap, while Cincinnati’s 71 plays produced exactly zero. When one team scores on three straight drives and the other cannot score on 71 snaps, the deeper numbers confirm what the scoreboard already shouted: explosive efficiency, not raw volume, decided this game.
Game Implications & Key Lessons
What This Means for the Ravens
- The win lifted Baltimore to 7-7 and kept its AFC North chase alive with three weeks to play, turning the pressure back onto Pittsburgh.
- The defense’s shutdown performance revealed a championship floor: a unit that could win games even when the offense held the ball for barely 20 minutes.
- The efficiency of the passing game, even in low volume, reestablished Jackson’s MVP-level floor after two straight losses.
What This Means for the Bengals
- Falling to 4-10 officially eliminated Cincinnati from postseason contention for the third straight season, wasting another prime year of Burrow’s career.
- The offense’s inability to convert 18 first downs and 298 yards into a single point exposed a red-zone and third-down crisis that no amount of Chase targets could fix.
- A defense that sacked Jackson four times and forced a fumble still lost by 24, proof that isolated stops mean nothing without complementary scoring.
Key Lessons
- Yards per attempt, not total yards, decided the game: 12.5 to 5.8 in Jackson’s favor.
- Derrick Henry’s 100-yard day kept the Ravens ahead of the sticks and neutralized the Bengals’ pass rush.
- Turnovers at the wrong moment, especially the 84-yard pick-six, flipped a competitive game into a blowout.
- Third-down defense was the quiet killer; Cincinnati converted just 3 of 15.
- Time of possession is worthless without points; 39:19 with the ball produced a goose egg.
- A two-touchdown flurry before halftime can break a road game open faster than a full half of grinding drives.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Ravens vs Bengals game on December 14, 2025?
The Baltimore Ravens beat the Cincinnati Bengals 24-0 at Paycor Stadium, posting their first shutout since 2018 and eliminating the Bengals from playoff contention.
What were Lamar Jackson’s stats in the shutout?
Lamar Jackson completed 8 of 12 passes for 150 yards and two touchdowns with one interception, plus two carries for 26 yards, finishing with a 114.6 passer rating.
How many passing yards did Lamar Jackson have?
Lamar Jackson threw for 150 passing yards against Cincinnati, averaging 12.5 yards per attempt on just 12 throws.
How many touchdown passes did Lamar Jackson throw?
He threw two touchdown passes, a 30-yard strike to Rasheen Ali and a 28-yard strike to Zay Flowers, both in the second quarter.
Did Derrick Henry rush for 100 yards?
Yes, Derrick Henry rushed for exactly 100 yards on 11 carries, averaging 9.1 yards per attempt, for his sixth 100-yard game of the 2025 season.
How many interceptions did Joe Burrow throw?
Joe Burrow threw two interceptions, including a fourth-quarter pick that Kyle Van Noy intercepted and lateraled to Alohi Gilman for an 84-yard touchdown.
Conclusion
The Ravens’ 24-0 win over the Bengals was a clinic in doing more with less. Baltimore turned 40 plays into 24 points while Cincinnati turned 71 plays into nothing, a reversal of everything raw volume suggests. Lamar Jackson’s two-touchdown, 12.5-yards-per-attempt afternoon paired with Derrick Henry’s grinding 100-yard day and a defense that produced two interceptions and ten quarterback hits showed why balanced, explosive football beats individual production every time. Efficiency beat effort, teamwork beat talent, and the scoreboard left no doubt about which mattered more.






